Flock/ALPR surveillance phase-out
Summary
Two speakers demanded the city disable or audit its Flock camera network, citing documented federal access, misuse, and stalking cases elsewhere — and questioning why over $1 million was spent without a public risk audit.
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 11
- Last 30 days
- 5
Rising — discussed at 4 meetings since Sep 14, 2026, up from 1 in the two months before.
Impact analysis
Over $1 million spent on the camera system so far.
Police investigations and businesses that lobbied to keep the cameras, per speakers.
Residents whose movements are tracked; speakers cited risks to immigrants, protesters and stalking victims.
Mentions & discussions (9)
Henrico removes all Flock cameras after company misses deadline
Henrico County crews removed all Flock cameras on Saturday after the company missed its deadline.
Henrico removes more than 120 Flock cameras after company misses deadline
More than 100 Public Works employees dismantled the license plate readers after Henrico ended its contract over privacy and data concerns.
Public Safety Standing Committee — October 27, 2026
Chief Edwards confirmed Mayor Avula will not renew the Flock ALPR contract, though alternatives and safeguards may be explored after community conversations. The chief credited the technology with solving homicides and hit-and-run cases and said policing will continue without it but will be harder for an understaffed department.
City Council — October 13, 2026
Multiple speakers pressed the council to remove all license plate readers now that Mayor Avula won't renew the Flock contract, and to keep replacement vendors out. Trammell pushed back hard in defense of cameras.
Avula explains decision not to renew Flock contract in Richmond as police chief reports drop in murders
Avula acknowledged that license plate readers can help police solve crimes, but said the city needs to balance those benefits with the privacy concerns of residents.
City Council — September 28, 2026
Residents asked the Council to end the Flock ALPR contract, saying warrantless tracking invades privacy and has failed to solve crimes, including one speaker's stolen car case.
City Council — September 14, 2026
Two speakers sharply criticized the city's Flock Safety camera contracts, citing privacy risks, federal data sharing, and impacts on immigrant and LGBTQ residents.
City Council — July 27, 2026
Two speakers demanded the city disable or audit its Flock camera network, citing documented federal access, misuse, and stalking cases elsewhere — and questioning why over $1 million was spent without a public risk audit.
City Council — May 11, 2026
Roughly twenty speakers urged the council to cut Flock camera funding from the budget, citing privacy abuses, police data-sharing with federal agencies, and litigation risk. The council funded the budget as adopted anyway; Council Member Robertson acknowledged privacy concerns need addressing.
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for Richmond
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.