Willoughby short-term rental overlay

Willoughby Civic League president spoke in support, citing the 300-foot buffer as a fair compromise, full grandfathering of existing operators, simpler administrative permits, and the four-strike enforcement system.

STR operator opposed, arguing tax revenue data is being withheld, complaint data is largely false, and enforcement is unequal versus hotels; cited a court ruling finding complaints tortious.

STR owner opposed the buffers, saying rentals welcome military families and support local shops, housekeepers, and restaurants.

Mixed testimony: supports some limits but called the 300-foot buffer unfair, framing it as property rights and an HOA-like rule imposed on owners.

STR owner recounted eleven rule changes since 2018, a denied permit despite paying fines and $68,000 in HVAC costs, and foreclosures she tied to the 2022 rule change.

A STR management company director argued the buffer targets legal operators while problems come from illegal ones, and enforcement should be the focus.

Called the process a witch hunt, saying five collaboration meetings produced few changes and the buffer will fuel hostility, discourage investment, and push owners to illegal rentals; urged eliminating the buffer or cutting it to 100 feet.

In rebuttal, argued the proposal is a fair compromise that addresses operator fears and resident burdens, and said keeping the status quo is the most unfair outcome.

In rebuttal, highlighted the Ocean View tourism zone designation, unsafe motels guests fled from, and alleged an illegal Willoughby Civic League vote on the proposal.